Spooner Row Message Board

Post Info TOPIC: Back of School Lane - Planning application for 5 dwellings. Ref 2019/0483
Anonymous

Date:
Back of School Lane - Planning application for 5 dwellings. Ref 2019/0483
Permalink   
 


Application Number: 2019/0483 
Applicant Name: Mr Grimmer 
Development Address: Land East, School Lane, Spooner Row, Norfolk, , 
Description: Erection of 5 dwellings 
Date Registered: 27/02/2019 
Status: Pending Consideration 

https://info.south-norfolk.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=PNLB5POQJ3Z00



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Back of School Lane - Planning for 5 dwellings. Ref 2019/0483
Permalink   
 


A new planning application has been submitted for 5 dwellings at the back of the existing properties in School Lane. Reference 2019/0483. The proposed area is the back garden of Meadow Rise, Station Road. The access will be via School Lane.

https://info.south-norfolk.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=PNLB5POQJ3Z00



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Is this application likely to get planning?

 

 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
RE: Back of School Lane - Planning application for 5 dwellings. Ref 2019/0483
Permalink   
 


Is the pope catholic?



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

An awful site for further housing sandwiched between existing houses and the railway line with the added bonus of a sewerage treatment plant at the end of the lane!  Surely that single track lane can not sustain the possibility of 10+ cars using it on a daily basis.

Fingers crossed planning is turned down again.

Anyone know anything?



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

At last, the perfect site for a Conservation Area which could be managed by the villagers.  The school is close too which would enable the children to explore nature a little. Perhaps the landowner will reconsider?     Spooner Row is having enough/will have enough housing in the long term, we must keep green spaces such as this for our quality of life.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

This site is part of a private garden so not a public area



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

The Environment Agency flood maps have designated most of the field as river flood zones 2 and 3 which means high flood risk, yet it looks like the owner is trying to say the whole plot should be considered as a low river flood risk of zone 1. Its a bit stupid to put houses on the small part of the field that's in zone 1 and gardens in zone 2 as the whole field is at risk. The entrance is a tiny track between 2 private properties where even the sewage truck has to be small to get access. Who wants to live close to a sewage station with a risk of it flooding onto properties and the smell - yuk!

Good idea of making it into a conservation area for public use, we need one of those in the village to counteract all the new houses. The flood area can be made into a natural pond. Barn owls and bats fly over there and lots of other birds and wildlife too - great!



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Last time I looked, the water level on the flood map from the Environmental Agency showed the water extended into several back gardens along School Lane. What has changed to alter the flood risk on this waterlogged site?



__________________
Andy

Date:
Permalink   
 

Just for info . This " site " is a private garden and not public land , the sewage facility was up graded 10 years ago and is a sealed plant therefore no smell, there are no sewage trucks coming or going down the track only maintenance vehicles and after living next door to this site/garden for 22 years it has never flooded .       



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Is the entrance, track and garage area owned by SNC or Anglian Water? I was wondering if this new road will be adopted and upgraded by the council as it can not stay the way it is especially with the increase in traffic. The crumbling asbestos garage on the end would need to be removed.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Andy wrote:

Just for info . This " site " is a private garden and not public land , the sewage facility was up graded 10 years ago and is a sealed plant therefore no smell, there are no sewage trucks coming or going down the track only maintenance vehicles and after living next door to this site/garden for 22 years it has never flooded .       


 Just because there hasn't been any flash flooding while you have lived there, it doesn't mean there will not be any in the future. This is a high-risk site and has flooded in the past.



__________________
Alison

Date:
Permalink   
 

Just to say, as the owners of Meadow Rise, this land has nothing to do with us, it was retained by the previous owner when we moved in 12 years ago



__________________
Andy

Date:
Permalink   
 

Understand that flooding can occur anywhere but as this land is above drainage ditches and the river it is unlikely   



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

I remember years ago that South Norfolk District council wouldn't allow this field to be in its development framework area because of the poor drainage ditches and river valley flooding potential.  The very narrow entrance from School Lane is ridiculus for a new housing development and the sewage smells at times. 



__________________
julian Halls

Date:
Permalink   
 

This matter will come before the planning sub at Wymondham Town council on tuesday the 19th March at 1800. Members of the public can attend and speak if they wish to do so.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Clearly, ...(edited).. has a vested interest in this being approved.



-- Edited by webstation on Wednesday 13th of March 2019 11:27:50 AM

__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Same old story of people who don't live in the village, or those wishing to make a fast buck then moving on to pastures new influencing/deciding on planning policy. No consultation with the local community BEFORE any plans or strategy has been agreed. We need our own Parish to help sort this out. I hope WTC will object to this application next week.



__________________
Jo

Date:
Permalink   
 

Just lodged an objection with the council regarding this. Let's hope they listen. The more of us who complain, the better.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

I can't see how the new proposed wider access to the track can be attained without substantial encroachment on the property next door. And not sure if the properties in School Lane will want to lose that much of their grass verge either, with No.14 even losing the steps to their front garden gate. Has this been thought through properly and have residents been informed of the new proposed access layout? This is becoming a bad joke.

Look at website documents dated 12 April 2019 - https://info.south-norfolk.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=PNLB5POQJ3Z00



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

One of the first things insurance companies ask when taking out house insurance is whether the property is in an area where a flood warning system is in place. These properties will be according to the plans.  These properties will be in the NRA's designated high flood zones with significant risk. If the new residents can obtain house insurance cover, their premiums would be astronomical and once they are flooded it would be highly unlikely they would get flood cover again. Is this a sensible place to build new properties?



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

This plot is not within the development boundary and SNC's 5-year land housing supply has now been met.  therefore as it does not meet the criteria for new development it needs to be refused or withdrawn.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

 

An excellent decision :)

https://info.south-norfolk.gov.uk/online-applications/files/075B1DC2A9509C74259EF09BC0B8E1F3/pdf/2019_0483-DECISION__K_-6363612.pdf 

 

 

(the link doesn't work, try https://info.south-norfolk.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=PNLB5POQJ3Z00

Webstation)

-- Edited by webstation on Wednesday 1st of May 2019 04:14:38 PM



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

This was a ridiculous planning proposal right from the start with lots of issues. I'm so pleased that the planning officer opted for refusal  thumbsup.gif



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

An Appeal has been registered against the Refusal for this planning application. The closing date for receipt of comments is within five weeks from the start of the appeal which is from 5 September (closing date 10 October). Comments to be sent to the Planning Inspectorate.

For details: https://info.south-norfolk.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=PNLB5POQJ3Z00

 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Please can someone explain the top 2 documents on this appeal?

Am I right in thinking that this planning looks like it may be approved unless turned down for access issues?

 

https://info.south-norfolk.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=PNLB5POQJ3Z00 

 

Many thanks.   One worried resident.

 

(apologies about the delay on publishing this, it got filed under spam, Webstation

-- Edited by webstation on Tuesday 22nd of October 2019 10:55:12 AM



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard